CENSATIMExpert-built EU Taxonomy Assessment
Know exactly where you
stand on EU Taxonomy alignment.
The full framework: technical screening criteria, DNSH and the generic appendices, distilled by genuine EU Taxonomy experts into a guided assessment.
A defensible, criterion-by-criterion view of your position. Zero wrong approvals across more than 1,000 validated test runs →
Where you stand. How confident to be. What evidence closes the gaps.
Eligibility is always free. See a sample report first →
Not sure where to start? Find your economic activity:
EU Taxonomy Reporting
Under Article 8 of the Taxonomy, firms that meet certain core criteria are required to report their alignment. See whether you fall in scope, then assess your activities criterion by criterion.
Free scoping & eligibility assessment→EU Taxonomy Asset Assessment
For gold-standard green use of proceeds, understand whether your asset could meet EU Taxonomy requirements, with an indicative report you can put in front of lenders and investors.
Free eligibility assessment→Why Censatim
Designed by EU Taxonomy specialists with more than 100 manual assessments behind the tool, not a generic AI wrapper. It asks what an expert would ask.
There is no official machine-readable version of the screening criteria, so we built our own structured database. Every criterion in your report is rendered from it verbatim, so the rules can never be misquoted.
Criteria reproduced verbatim, every finding cited to its evidence, and the full dialogue annexed to the report. Every rating traces back to its source.
How it works
Explain the company, asset or activity in plain language, and upload any supporting documents.
A short set of targeted questions; only what the criteria actually need. Plain-language help if anything is unclear.
A criterion-by-criterion view with ratings and confidence levels, as a branded, downloadable report. Typically 10 to 20 minutes.
See a real report
A 54 MW Danish wind farm with documents uploaded: all three dimensions in line, High confidence where the evidence carries it.
A Finnish colocation facility in fund due diligence: contribution and safeguards in line, one DNSH objective not aligned, gaps prioritised.
A 420 MW CCGT assessed honestly against the transitional criteria: not aligned, with the full reasoning and remediation picture.
View all sample reports, including the eligibility checks →
All sample subjects are fictional, prepared to show exactly what you receive.
The honest comparison
| Traditional consultant | Censatim | |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | £10,000 to £30,000+ | From £549 |
| Time to result | 4 to 8 weeks | Typically 10 to 20 minutes |
| Coverage | Scoped per engagement | All 242 Taxonomy activities |
| Output | Report after workshops | Criterion-by-criterion report, instantly downloadable |
| Traceability | Methodology varies by team | Verbatim criteria, cited evidence, full Q&A annex |
| When you need a signed opinion | Included at full cost | Practitioner review available as an add-on |
Plain-language questions, one answer box per question, and a “rephrase this” button for anything unclear. No account, no sales call, no procurement process: just your email address so we can send you the results.
Consultant figures are indicative market ranges for a single-asset EU Taxonomy assessment. Censatim provides AI-assisted analysis, not a formal opinion; practitioner review is the route to a signed assessment. See a sample report before you decide.
We stand behind every report.
Find a factual or technical error in a paid alignment report and you receive a full refund plus £50. Email support@censatim.com quoting your reference. Paid alignment reports only; terms apply. That commitment is possible because of how we test: see the validation record →
New to the framework? Start with What is the EU Taxonomy?, browse our activity guides, see exactly how we assess, review how we test it, or read our published reports.