CENSATIMHow we assess →Sample reports
Exactly what you receive,
at every tier, across the full verdict range.
Complete, unedited assessments produced by the tool. In-line, Partial, Not aligned, Not eligible: every verdict the tool can reach is on display here, because a sample library with only green results would tell you nothing. All companies, assets and documents shown are fictitious, created to demonstrate the assessment. If you believe a name should be changed or removed, email support@censatim.com.
Your own reports are private and confidential. Censatim will never publish a customer report, in any form, without express permission.
Eligibility reports (free stage)
The screening outcome, including the honest No: activities the Taxonomy simply does not cover.
Ahenobarbus Recruitment, United Kingdom
A recruitment firm whose activities sit outside the Taxonomy: the screening outcome, recorded professionally.
Livorno Peaker, Italy
A 1998 oil-fired peaking plant: outside the Taxonomy, and the report records exactly that.
Substantial Contribution tier
The mid tier: the technical screening criteria assessed and scoped honestly, including a rejection on evidence quality.
Lindholm House, Denmark
A single owned building assessed at the mid tier: in line on the class A route, with the scope stated plainly.
Athlone Charge Park, Ireland
A purpose-built EV charging hub: dedicated zero-emission infrastructure, in line at the mid tier.
Wallgate House, Ireland
A 1998 office relying on a draft, unadopted national benchmark: the evidence is rejected and the verdict says so.
Full Alignment
All three dimensions: substantial contribution, every applicable DNSH objective, and the Minimum Social Safeguards, across the full verdict range.
Havreholm Wind Farm, Denmark
A 54 MW onshore wind farm with documents uploaded: all three dimensions in line.
Borealis DC-2, Finland
A colocation data centre in fund due diligence: one DNSH objective not aligned.
Meridian Court, Germany
A single owned building through Full Alignment: only the objectives that apply are ever probed.
Iberia DC-1, Spain
A data centre with evaporative cooling in a water-stressed region, and no water plan: the verdict follows the evidence.
BioKraft Anlage Emsland, Germany
A bio-waste digestion plant: substantial contribution met, one confirmed DNSH absence, Partial overall.
Zuidhaven Vastgoed, Netherlands
A property group: three activities surfaced, the owned portfolio assessed with its qualifying sub-set identified.
Caesar Energia, Italy
An energy group with several business areas, including a gas plant assessed honestly against the transitional criteria.
Multi-activity chains
One company, several activities: linked reports with entity-level safeguards carried across, concluded by a free family summary.
Constantine Energy, Europe
One integrated power company, three linked reports and the free family summary: solar and wind in line, the grid activity honestly Partial.
Every report includes the criteria reproduced verbatim, evidence citations on each finding, prioritised information gaps, and the complete question-and-answer record. See the methodology for how conclusions are reached, and the activity guides for a sample matched to your sector.
Assess a company →Assess an asset →